Brokers  /  GFS

GFS

High risk
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · 2-5 years · since 2023-04-17 · GFS
This is a , not a leveraged forex/CFD broker — listed for reference. If you’re looking for a forex broker, see our forex broker directory.
Unregulated
Visit site ↗
Independent ratingshow third parties score this broker
WikiFX1.43/10
Trustpilot/5
Forex Peace Army/5
🛡️ Been scammed or can’t withdraw from GFS? Our free assistant writes up your case and shows exactly what to do next →
🇺🇸
No sign that GFS actively operates in your country (United States). If you were solicited from here, be extra cautious — it may be an unregulated approach or a clone.
51
High risk
Scam Risk Scoremonitored · 2026-07-28
Lower riskHigher risk
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • No verifiable website or social-media presence
How this score is calculated — view the open algorithm

A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.

FactorScoreWeight
Regulation & licensing8535%
Company age4515%
Clone / impersonation012%
Withdrawal & exposure complaints012%
Offshore registration108%
Transparency (site/info/social)10010%

Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.

Company
Legal nameGFS
Headquarters🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Founded2023-04-17
Years operating2-5 years
Employees0
Official websitetrader.am1myprofess.me
Trading conditions
Avg execution speed0 ms
Avg slippage0
Swap rating
Trading cost rating
Monitored traders0
Monitored orders0
Funding & instruments
Deposit methods
Withdrawal methods
Instruments

Regulation & licenses · 0

No valid regulatory license found — high caution advised.

Review analysis AI

GFS is an unregulated UK-registered entity with no public web presence beyond an obscure domain. The elevated scam risk score (51/100) reflects the absence of licensing and verifiable information. Without a clear service offering or regulatory oversight, it poses a substantial risk to traders and cannot be recommended.

Not for
  • Anyone seeking a regulated, transparent broker
  • Traders requiring account protection or compensation schemes
Period:

Real user reviews

Similar brokers

About GFS

Overview

GFS is a financial services entity registered in the United Kingdom, with an official website at am1myprofess.me. It was founded on 17 April 2023, placing it as a very recent market participant. However, the domain itself is atypical for a financial firm and raises immediate questions about its legitimacy and operational transparency.

Our review found no trace of GFS on any major regulatory register, including those of the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The absence of regulation is a critical flag for any broker, as it means trader funds are not protected by any recognised compensation scheme. For cautious traders, this lack of oversight should be a decisive factor when considering any engagement.

Regulation and Safety

FXCanary has cross-checked the known facts against public regulatory databases. The records confirm that GFS holds no licence from any financial regulator as of our review date. This includes the FCA, which oversees all firms conducting regulated activities in the United Kingdom.

Without a license, traders have no formal recourse in the event of a dispute or if the entity becomes insolvent. The scam risk score assigned by FXCanary is 51 out of 100, categorised as 'Elevated'. This score reflects the heightened risk stemming from the complete absence of regulatory oversight and the limited verifiable information available.

Company Profile

GFS lists its country of registration as the United Kingdom, but no specific address or company number is publicly associated with the domain am1myprofess.me. The registration date of April 2023 suggests the firm is less than two years old, which places it in a high-risk category for broker longevity.

Many legitimate brokers build a track record over several years and submit to regulatory audits. In GFS's case, the lack of historical data or any independent reviews leaves traders with no basis to assess its reliability. Aggregated industry databases similarly show no user feedback, which is common for obscure or shell entities.

Products and Services

Due to the extremely limited public information, FXCanary cannot confirm what products or services GFS offers. The website am1myprofess.me does not appear to be a standard trading platform or brokerage landing page. It is possible that the domain is either dormant or used for non-trading purposes.

If GFS does claim to offer forex or CFD trading, the absence of any licensing would make it an illegal operation in most regulated jurisdictions. Traders should avoid any approach from this entity unless it can provide verifiable licensing and a transparent contact address.

Account Types and Platforms

No information about account types, platforms, or trading conditions is available from independent sources. The broker's own website may contain such details, but our analysis did not retrieve any meaningful content from the domain.

This lack of transparency is itself a significant warning. Reputable brokers typically display their spreads, leverage options, and platform partners prominently. Without this data, potential clients cannot perform a fair comparison or evaluate costs.

Deposits and Withdrawals

Funding methods and withdrawal policies are unknown for GFS. There are no customer testimonials or process descriptions visible online.

Reliable brokers provide clear instructions on deposits and withdrawals, often including multiple secure payment channels. The absence of such information here suggests a lack of operational infrastructure, increasing the likelihood of investor difficulties when attempting to access funds.

Conclusion

GFS appears to be a very young, unregistered entity with no verifiable footprint in the financial services industry. The domain used is unconventional and does not inspire confidence. FXCanary strongly advises traders to exercise extreme caution and to avoid depositing funds with any firm that cannot demonstrate a valid regulatory licence.

Until GFS provides transparent documentation and submits to independent oversight, it should be considered a high-risk counterparty. The most prudent course for traders is to choose a fully regulated broker with a public track record.

Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full GFS review