Brokers  /  Tradesview

Tradesview

Severe riskForex / CFD broker
🇺🇸 United States · 5-10 years · since 2020-08-21 · Tradesview
Unregulated
Visit site ↗
🛡️ Been scammed or can’t withdraw from Tradesview? Our free assistant writes up your case and shows exactly what to do next →
🇺🇸
No sign that Tradesview actively operates in your country (United States). If you were solicited from here, be extra cautious — it may be an unregulated approach or a clone.
75
Severe risk
Scam Risk Scoremonitored · 2026-07-28
Lower riskHigher risk
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • Withdrawal complaints in ~100% of recent reviews
  • No verifiable website or social-media presence
How this score is calculated — view the open algorithm

A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.

FactorScoreWeight
Regulation & licensing8535%
Company age2215%
Clone / impersonation012%
Withdrawal & exposure complaints612%
Offshore registration108%
Transparency (site/info/social)10010%

Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.

Company
Legal nameTradesview
Headquarters🇺🇸 United States
Founded2020-08-21
Years operating5-10 years
Employees0
Official websitetradesview.io
Trading conditions
Avg execution speed0 ms
Avg slippage0
Swap rating
Trading cost rating
Monitored traders0
Monitored orders0
Funding & instruments
Deposit methods · --
Withdrawal methods · --
Instruments--

Regulation & licenses · 0

No valid regulatory license found — high caution advised.

Account types · 6

AccountMax leverageMin. depositMin. spreadCommissionEA
DIAMOND--$50000----
GOLD--$25000----
SILVER--$10000----
PRO--$5000----
PREMIUM--$2000----
STARTER PLAN--$500----

Review analysis AI

Tradesview presents a severe risk profile due to its complete lack of regulatory oversight. The high minimum deposits and absence of disclosed leverage or trading instruments further obscure the true nature of the offering. Without any verifiable safeguards, potential clients face significant exposure to operational and fraud risks.

Best for
  • High-net-worth traders comfortable with unregulated environments
  • Traders seeking high minimum deposit account tiers
Not for
  • Regulation-conscious retail traders
  • Traders requiring low entry barriers or full transparency
Period:
What users praise
Where reviewers are from
United States1

Real user reviews

Similar brokers

About Tradesview

Overview

Tradesview is a brokerage entity registered in the United States, founded in August 2020. The firm operates the website tradesview.io and offers a tiered account structure with minimum deposits ranging from $500 to $50,000. Our records indicate that Tradesview does not hold any financial regulatory licences from recognised authorities, placing it outside the oversight of major regulators such as the SEC, CFTC, or FCA.

Given the absence of regulatory authorisation, FXCanary flags this broker with a high-risk score of 75/100, reflecting severe concerns for trader protection. Traders should exercise extreme caution when considering any engagement with an unregistered entity.

Regulation and Licensing

According to the known facts, Tradesview is not regulated by any financial supervisory body. This means there is no independent oversight of the broker's operations, no mandatory segregation of client funds, and no access to compensation schemes in the event of insolvency or misconduct.

For traders accustomed to regulated brokers, this lack of oversight represents a significant red flag. Unregulated brokers in the United States are often associated with higher risk of fraud, abrupt closure, or unfair trading practices.

Account Types and Minimum Deposits

Tradesview offers six distinct account tiers: Starter Plan ($500 minimum), Premium ($2,000), Pro ($5,000), Silver ($10,000), Gold ($25,000), and Diamond ($50,000). These high entry levels suggest the broker targets affluent or professional traders rather than casual retail clients.

The maximum leverage for each account is not specified in our records. The lack of leverage data is a notable omission, as leverage is a critical factor in risk assessment for leveraged trading products.

Trading Instruments and Platforms

Information regarding the available trading instruments (e.g., forex pairs, CFDs, indices, commodities) and the trading platforms offered (e.g., MetaTrader, cTrader, proprietary web platform) is not available in our known facts. Without this data, it is impossible to assess the breadth of market access or the quality of execution technology.

Prospective clients should verify these details directly with the broker, but the lack of public disclosure raises concerns about transparency.

Funding and Withdrawals

No specific details about funding methods, withdrawal policies, or processing fees are recorded for Tradesview. Common methods in the industry include bank wire transfers, credit/debit cards, and e-wallets, but this is speculative without confirmation from the broker.

Given the high minimum deposits and unregulated status, traders should anticipate potential difficulties in accessing funds or long withdrawal delays.

Target Clientele

The graduated account structure with high minimum deposits suggests Tradesview aims at high-net-worth individuals or experienced traders who can afford substantial capital commitments. The Diamond account, requiring $50,000, is particularly geared towards institutional-scale retail clients.

However, the absence of regulatory safeguards makes this offering unsuitable for most retail traders, especially those without significant risk tolerance and financial resilience.

Conclusion on Risk

FXCanary's assessment of Tradesview is dominated by its complete lack of regulatory oversight. The severe risk score of 75/100 reflects this fundamental issue, amplified by the opaque disclosures around leverage, instruments, and platforms.

Traders considering this broker should demand verifiable evidence of a regulated status, segregated funds, and proof of operational history. Until such evidence is provided, we strongly advise against depositing funds with any unregulated entity.

Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full Tradesview review