LiquidBrokers

LiquidBrokers is an Australian-registered forex and CFD broker that began operations on 23 December 2024. The firm lists its registered address at 1/15 Packer Road Baringa, Queensland, Australia, 4551. It is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as an Appointed Representative (AR) with an active status.

Our review found that public information about LiquidBrokers is extremely limited beyond the regulatory register. The official domain liquidfx.io currently redirects to an unrelated Vietnamese gambling site, raising significant questions about the broker’s operational transparency. As such, FXCanary relies on verified registry data and aggregated industry databases to provide this introductory profile.

LiquidBrokers holds an AR licence under ASIC in Australia. This means the broker is not directly licensed but acts under an existing Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence holder. The AR status provides a layer of regulatory oversight, but clients should confirm the principal licensee and their own coverage under Australian client fund rules.

Given the mismatch between the official domain and the broker's stated identity, caution is warranted. ASIC's register shows the AR status as active, but no additional public records from the broker's own website could be verified. FXCanary's Scam Risk Score for LiquidBrokers is 32 out of 100, indicating a guarded level of risk.

LiquidBrokers offers four account types according to its regulatory filings: a No Commission account, a VIP account requiring a minimum deposit of $100,000, an ECN account, and an Islamic account. All accounts provide a maximum leverage of 1:500. The minimum deposit for the No Commission, ECN, and Islamic accounts is not specified in the available records.

These account structures suggest a focus on high-volume traders and those seeking Sharia-compliant trading. However, without independent verification from a functioning broker website, prospective clients cannot assess actual spreads, commissions, or platform reliability. The 1:500 leverage is aggressive and may not be permitted for all retail clients under ASIC rules, which typically cap leverage at 1:30 for CFD trading.

The broker claims to offer a broad range of instruments: currencies, cryptocurrencies, metals, indices, stocks, commodities, and crypto perpetual futures. This multi-asset offering is typical for modern CFD brokers, but no details about trading platforms (e.g., MetaTrader 4/5, cTrader) are listed in the known facts.

Aggregated industry databases do not provide further clarity on platforms or execution models. The lack of a verifiable website means traders cannot confirm available trading tools, charting features, or order types. This information gap is a significant red flag for due diligence.

The only concrete funding detail available is that the broker accepts crypto deposits. No information on fiat currency options, withdrawal processing times, or fees is present in the records. The VIP account’s high minimum deposit suggests that the broker targets affluent clients, but the absence of standard banking information is concerning.

Crypto deposits introduce additional volatility and regulatory complexity. Australian-regulated brokers typically offer bank transfers, credit cards, and e-wallets, so the sole reliance on cryptocurrency is unusual and may limit accessibility for retail traders.

LiquidBrokers appears to target both retail and high-net-worth individuals, given its mix of low-barrier account types (No Commission, ECN, Islamic) and the $100,000 minimum VIP account. The high leverage of 1:500 across all accounts may appeal to speculators, but it also increases risk for inexperienced traders.

The broker’s very recent establishment—just months before this review—means it has no track record. Combined with the domain redirection issue, the broker is currently only suitable for traders who can perform extensive independent verification of its operations.

LiquidBrokers presents itself as a leveraged forex and CFD broker under ASIC oversight, but critical gaps in public information undermine its credibility. The official domain does not resolve to the broker’s own site, and no independent user reviews exist to corroborate its claims.

Traders should approach LiquidBrokers with extreme caution and seek confirmation of its regulatory status and operational integrity before committing funds. FXCanary will update this profile as more verifiable information becomes available.