Brokers  /  765view Options

765view Options

High riskForex / CFD broker
🇺🇸 United States · 2-5 years · since 2022-07-18 · 765view Options
Unregulated
Visit site ↗
Independent ratingshow third parties score this broker
WikiFX1.47/10
Trustpilot/5
Forex Peace Army/5
🛡️ Been scammed or can’t withdraw from 765view Options? Our free assistant writes up your case and shows exactly what to do next →
🇺🇸
No sign that 765view Options actively operates in your country (United States). If you were solicited from here, be extra cautious — it may be an unregulated approach or a clone.
51
High risk
Scam Risk Scoremonitored · 2026-07-28
Lower riskHigher risk
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • No verifiable website or social-media presence
How this score is calculated — view the open algorithm

A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.

FactorScoreWeight
Regulation & licensing8535%
Company age4515%
Clone / impersonation012%
Withdrawal & exposure complaints012%
Offshore registration108%
Transparency (site/info/social)10010%

Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.

Company
Legal name765view Options
Headquarters🇺🇸 United States
Founded2022-07-18
Years operating2-5 years
Employees0
Official website765viewoptions.online
Trading conditions
Avg execution speed0 ms
Avg slippage0
Swap rating
Trading cost rating
Monitored traders0
Monitored orders0
Funding & instruments
Deposit methods · --
Withdrawal methods · --
Instruments--

Regulation & licenses · 0

No valid regulatory license found — high caution advised.

Account types · 3

AccountMax leverageMin. depositMin. spreadCommissionEA
Platinum--£ 10,000----
Classic--£ 5,000----
Starter --£ 500----

Review analysis AI

765view Options is an unregistered and unregulated brokerage with no verifiable track record or independent user feedback. The lack of regulatory oversight, combined with minimal publicly available information, places it in the high-risk category. Until the broker provides transparent details about its operations, licensing status, and financial safeguards, traders are strongly advised to steer clear of this entity.

Best for
  • Tradeers willing to accept high risk in an unregulated environment
  • Speculators with large capital seeking potentially bespoke account terms
Not for
  • Traders who require regulatory protection and fund segregation
  • Investors who need transparent fee and instrument disclosure
  • Anyone seeking a broker with a proven track record and independent reviews
Period:

Real user reviews

Similar brokers

About 765view Options

Overview

765view Options is a brokerage entity registered in the United States, founded on 18 July 2022. The firm operates under the domain 765viewoptions.online. Based on publicly available records, the broker does not hold any regulatory licences from recognised financial authorities, which places it in a category that demands heightened caution from potential clients.

Given the lack of regulatory oversight and the scarcity of independent public information about the broker’s operations, traders should approach 765view Options with considerable scepticism. The absence of verifiable data makes it difficult to assess the firm’s reliability, financial standing, or the quality of its trading services.

Account Types

According to the limited information available, 765view Options offers three account tiers: Starter, Classic, and Platinum. The Starter account requires a minimum deposit of £500, the Classic account £5,000, and the Platinum account £10,000. The broker does not disclose maximum leverage levels for any of these accounts.

These deposit thresholds suggest that the broker targets a range of retail traders, from those with modest capital to those with substantial funds. However, without details on spreads, commissions, or leverage, it is challenging to evaluate the cost structure or risk profile of trading with this firm.

Instruments and Platform

No information is available regarding the trading instruments offered by 765view Options. The broker does not list asset classes such as forex, indices, commodities, or cryptocurrencies on its registration records. Similarly, the trading platform(s) used – whether proprietary or third-party like MetaTrader 4/5 – are not specified.

This lack of transparency is a significant red flag. Reputable brokers typically provide clear details about their product range and technology. The absence of such information makes it impossible for traders to confirm whether the broker actually facilitates the trading activities it purports to offer.

Regulatory Status

The most critical finding in our review is that 765view Options operates without any known regulatory authorisation. The broker is not listed on the registers of major financial watchdogs such as the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, or the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC).

Trading with an unregulated broker exposes clients to heightened risks, including the potential for misappropriation of funds, lack of dispute resolution mechanisms, and no assurance of fair trading practices. In FXCanary’s assessment, this regulatory vacuum is the primary factor behind the broker’s elevated scam risk score of 51 out of 100.

Target Audience

The broker appears to target retail traders seeking leveraged trading opportunities, given its account tier structure and the typical profile of such firms. However, the high minimum deposit for the Platinum account (£10,000) may also appeal to more affluent individuals or semi-professional traders.

Without regulatory safeguards and verifiable operational history, 765view Options is not suitable for risk-averse traders or those who prioritise fund security. The broker’s opacity suggests it may be best avoided entirely until further credible information emerges.

Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full 765view Options review