Trader Reports Withdrawal Delays and Partial Refund from QUANT TEKEL

A Trustpilot user has filed a complaint against QUANT TEKEL, alleging serious withdrawal issues. According to the user, they requested a withdrawal on July 7th but were told a few days later that "there was a problem with the data" and were given two options: a refund to their account or a 30-day waiting period before requesting withdrawal again. The user says they chose the waiting period twice, submitted support tickets, and received no response, even on Discord.

They also scheduled calls with the risk team twice, but neither call occurred. Recently, they received another call request and scheduled it for September 8th, but then received an email stating they would receive a $100 account refund—which they claim they never chose. The user notes that a $100 refund is far less than the $1,900 payout they were expecting, and that their last withdrawal took almost four months to arrive.

They conclude by saying they would not recommend anyone open an account with this company.

This complaint highlights several red flags commonly seen in forex/CFD trading scams: repeated delays in processing withdrawals, excuses about data problems, unresponsive customer support, and offers of partial refunds that are significantly lower than the amount requested. Traders should be cautious when a broker consistently delays payouts or pressures clients into accepting reduced amounts.

For anyone considering trading with QUANT TEKEL or similar platforms, it is crucial to conduct thorough research, check regulatory status, and read independent reviews. Always start with small deposits, and if withdrawal issues arise, document all communications and consider reporting the firm to relevant financial authorities. Remember that if a company refuses to return your funds or only offers a fraction, it may be a sign of a larger problem.

This report is based solely on the Trustpilot user's account and has not been independently verified. Traders are advised to exercise due diligence and treat such claims as warnings rather than proven facts.