pepperstone vs Starkivo
Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.
✦ AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safer pick pepperstone leads on safety — winning 3 of 4
trust metrics (lower scam-risk, stronger regulation). Check the selection rows for the best fit.
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk scoreⓘ lower = safer
✓20
57
Verdict
Low risk
Elevated
Regulatedⓘ
Yes
No
Licenses
✓4
0
Tier-1 regulatorsⓘ
✓3
0
Trustpilot score
4.3
—
Reviews collected
3536
—
Exit riskⓘ lower = safer
Guarded
—
Known clonesⓘ
10
✓0
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
✓$13
$100
Max leverage
—
—
Min spread (best acct)
from 0
—
Commission
$0
—
Cost grade
C
—
Account types
2
✓5
Best for
Suits
Experienced traders who value tight spreads and fast execution, Traders who prefer TradingView integration for chart-based order placement, Those who prioritize regulatory oversight from top-tier authorities
Traders willing to accept high risk for potentially high reward, Experienced traders seeking high minimum deposit accounts with possible premium services
Not for
Traders who require simple and quick account verification, Those who have had issues with payment method restrictions and need flexible withdrawals, Traders who are sensitive to occasional slippage and execution errors
Risk-averse traders, Traders requiring regulatory protection or oversight, Beginners who need transparent and well-documented offerings
Products & Funding
Instruments
1350+ markets including shares, indices, forex, commodities and more.
--
Deposit methods
--
--
Withdrawal
--
--
Execution
Speed
AAA
—
Slippage
B
—
Swap cost
A
—
Company
Founded
2017-09-07
2025-08-26
Headquarters
🇦🇺 Australia
🇦🇺 Australia
Employees
0
0
✓ = stronger value on that row · ● good · ● caution · ● weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.