Longasia vs Phillip CFD
Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.
✦ AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk scoreⓘ lower = safer
85
✓42
Verdict
Severe
Guarded
Regulatedⓘ
Yes
No
Licenses
✓2
0
Tier-1 regulatorsⓘ
✓1
0
Trustpilot score
2.5
—
Reviews collected
16
—
Exit riskⓘ lower = safer
—
—
Known clonesⓘ
1
✓0
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
—
—
Max leverage
—
—
Min spread (best acct)
—
—
Commission
—
—
Cost grade
—
—
Account types
0
0
Best for
Suits
—
Traders seeking access to a wide range of equity CFDs with no additional spread, Singapore-based traders familiar with the Phillip brand, Those looking for MetaTrader 5 platform with local market access
Not for
Traders requiring reliable withdrawals, Investors seeking regulatory protection, Anyone considering depositing funds
U.S. persons or residents of countries where CFDs are restricted, Traders who prioritize regulatory oversight and investor protection, Investors requiring tight forex spreads or comprehensive funding options
Products & Funding
Instruments
—
—
Deposit methods
—
—
Withdrawal
—
—
Execution
Speed
—
—
Slippage
—
—
Swap cost
—
—
Company
Founded
2017-12-05
2019-12-09
Headquarters
🇸🇬 Singapore
🇸🇬 Singapore
Employees
0
0
✓ = stronger value on that row · ● good · ● caution · ● weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.