JUNO vs MarquisFX
Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.
✦ AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safer pick JUNO leads on safety — winning 3 of 3
trust metrics (lower scam-risk, stronger regulation). Check the selection rows for the best fit.
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk scoreⓘ lower = safer
✓28
85
Verdict
Guarded
Severe
Regulatedⓘ
Yes
Yes
Licenses
✓2
1
Tier-1 regulatorsⓘ
✓1
0
Trustpilot score
3.3
—
Reviews collected
318
—
Exit riskⓘ lower = safer
—
—
Known clonesⓘ
0
0
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
$15
—
Max leverage
1:1000
—
Min spread (best acct)
from 0.1
—
Commission
$7
—
Cost grade
B
—
Account types
✓3
0
Best for
Suits
Traders seeking low spreads and high leverage up to 1:1000, Newbies who want a bonus and easy deposit process, Crypto withdrawal users who value speed
Experienced traders willing to accept high risk, Traders seeking offshore regulation with flexible leverage
Not for
Traders who rely on strict Tier-1 regulation, Those planning to use PAMM accounts or third-party management, Risk-averse users who cannot tolerate potential withdrawal delays
Risk-averse traders, Traders requiring strong regulatory protection, Beginners or those with low capital
Products & Funding
Instruments
Forex, Metals, Stocks Indices, Oil
—
Deposit methods
--
—
Withdrawal
--
—
Execution
Speed
AA
—
Slippage
AA
—
Swap cost
A
—
Company
Founded
2017-09-26
2017-12-26
Headquarters
🇻🇺 Vanuatu
🇻🇺 Vanuatu
Employees
0
0
✓ = stronger value on that row · ● good · ● caution · ● weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.