iqcent vs WIDE CFD
Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.
✦ AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safer pick WIDE CFD leads on safety — winning 1 of 1
trust metrics (lower scam-risk, stronger regulation). Check the selection rows for the best fit.
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk scoreⓘ lower = safer
75
✓49
Verdict
Severe
Guarded
Regulatedⓘ
No
No
Licenses
0
0
Tier-1 regulatorsⓘ
0
0
Trustpilot score
2.8
—
Reviews collected
311
—
Exit riskⓘ lower = safer
Elevated
—
Known clonesⓘ
0
0
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
✓$100
$500
Max leverage
—
1/500
Min spread (best acct)
—
—
Commission
—
—
Cost grade
—
—
Account types
✓4
3
Best for
Suits
Low-budget traders testing small strategies, Users comfortable with unregulated offshore brokers
High-volume traders with large capital, Traders seeking high leverage options
Not for
Traders who need reliable and timely withdrawals, Investors seeking regulated brokers and deposit protection, Long-term traders with significant capital
Regulation-conscious traders, Beginners or small retail investors, Those requiring strong investor protection
Products & Funding
Instruments
--
--
Deposit methods
--
--
Withdrawal
--
--
Execution
Speed
—
—
Slippage
—
—
Swap cost
—
—
Company
Founded
2022-11-24
2020-10-19
Headquarters
🇲🇭 Marshall Islands
🇲🇭 Marshall Islands
Employees
0
0
✓ = stronger value on that row · ● good · ● caution · ● weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.