FXOpen vs FXOpen
Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.
✦ AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safer pick FXOpen leads on safety — winning 2 of 3
trust metrics (lower scam-risk, stronger regulation). Check the selection rows for the best fit.
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk scoreⓘ lower = safer
26
✓21
Verdict
Guarded
Low risk
Regulatedⓘ
Yes
Yes
Licenses
2
2
Tier-1 regulatorsⓘ
2
2
Trustpilot score
✓3.7
2.8
Reviews collected
✓453
3
Exit riskⓘ lower = safer
Low risk
—
Known clonesⓘ
1
1
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
$100
$100
Max leverage
—
—
Min spread (best acct)
from 0
from 0
Commission
$1.5
$1.5
Cost grade
—
—
Account types
4
4
Best for
Suits
Experienced traders seeking ECN accounts with low spreads, Long-term users comfortable with multiple platform options, Traders who prefer cryptocurrency deposit and withdrawal methods
Cost-effective ECN trading with low spreads, Regulated broker under CySEC and FCA, Access to over 700 instruments across multiple asset classes
Not for
Traders who prioritize highly responsive customer support, Users concerned about strict withdrawal policies, especially regarding bonuses, Beginners who may be more vulnerable to complex KYC requirements
Traders with very small capital (Basic account still requires $100 and limited features), Beginners seeking extensive educational resources and step-by-step guidance, US residents (not regulated in the US)
Products & Funding
Instruments
--
--
Deposit methods
--
--
Withdrawal
--
--
Execution
Speed
—
—
Slippage
—
—
Swap cost
—
—
Company
Founded
2018-11-26
2018-11-26
Headquarters
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Employees
0
0
✓ = stronger value on that row · ● good · ● caution · ● weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.