fpmarkets vs quadcode markets
Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.
✦ AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safer pick fpmarkets leads on safety — winning 4 of 4
trust metrics (lower scam-risk, stronger regulation). Check the selection rows for the best fit.
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk scoreⓘ lower = safer
✓20
27
Verdict
Low risk
Guarded
Regulatedⓘ
Yes
Yes
Licenses
2
2
Tier-1 regulatorsⓘ
2
2
Trustpilot score
✓4.8
2.1
Reviews collected
✓10255
48
Exit riskⓘ lower = safer
Guarded
—
Known clonesⓘ
✓6
7
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
$100
—
Max leverage
1:500
—
Min spread (best acct)
from 0
—
Commission
$3.5
—
Cost grade
AAA
—
Account types
✓2
0
Best for
Suits
Traders who prioritize regulatory oversight (ASIC, CySEC) and a wide range of instruments, Traders who value fast, friendly customer support for routine issues, Traders comfortable with a low-risk score and willing to navigate occasional withdrawal friction
—
Not for
Traders who require guaranteed, hassle-free withdrawals, Traders who are sensitive to latency and execution speed, Traders who have had prior disputes over 'abusive trading' accusations
Retail traders seeking reliable fund safety, Beginners unfamiliar with broker due diligence, Traders with significant capital at risk
Products & Funding
Instruments
70+ FX pairs, metals, indices, commodities
—
Deposit methods
Bank, transfer, NETELLER, Skrill, PerfectMoney
—
Withdrawal
Skrill, PerfectMoney, Neteller
—
Execution
Speed
AA
—
Slippage
D
—
Swap cost
B
—
Company
Founded
2017-09-07
2023-03-29
Headquarters
🇦🇺 Australia
🇦🇺 Australia
Employees
0
0
✓ = stronger value on that row · ● good · ● caution · ● weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.