Home / Compare / Fake IC Markets vs FNT

Fake IC Markets vs FNT

Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.

AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safer pick FNT leads on safety — winning 3 of 3 trust metrics (lower scam-risk, stronger regulation). Check the selection rows for the best fit.
Fake IC Markets
85/100 risk
🇦🇺 Australia
Read review →
FNT
41/100 risk
🇦🇺 Australia
Read review →
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk score lower = safer
85
41
Verdict
Severe
Guarded
Regulated
Yes
Yes
Licenses
1
2
Tier-1 regulators
1
2
Trustpilot score
Reviews collected
Exit risk lower = safer
Known clones
0
0
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
Max leverage
Min spread (best acct)
Commission
Cost grade
Account types
0
0
Best for
Suits
Nothing – avoid entirely
Traders seeking a regulated Australian entity (if licences are active), Those interested in market making or derivatives trading
Not for
Retail forex or CFD trading, Any form of investment
Traders requiring a transparent, verifiable web presence, Investors who prioritise active social media and customer support, Anyone seeking clear product details or account information
Products & Funding
Instruments
Deposit methods
Withdrawal
Execution
Speed
Slippage
Swap cost
Company
Founded
2021-08-24
2021-07-30
Headquarters
🇦🇺 Australia
🇦🇺 Australia
Employees
0
0

✓ = stronger value on that row · good · caution · weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.

← Compare other brokers