Home / Compare / esaFX vs MULIA FX

esaFX vs MULIA FX

Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.

AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
esaFX Forex
33/100 risk
Indonesia
Read review →
MULIA FX Forex
41/100 risk
Indonesia
Read review →
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk score lower = safer
33
41
Verdict
Guarded
Guarded
Regulated
Yes
Yes
Licenses
2
2
Tier-1 regulators
0
0
Trustpilot score
3.2
Reviews collected
1
Exit risk lower = safer
Known clones
1
0
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
$10
Max leverage
1:200
Min spread (best acct)
from 1
Commission
$0.5
Cost grade
Account types
3
0
Best for
Suits
Indonesian traders seeking a locally regulated broker, Low-budget retail traders (minimum deposit $10), Traders interested in Indonesian commodities like palm oil and coffee
Indonesian retail traders seeking local regulation, Traders who prioritize domestic regulatory oversight (if licenses are verified)
Not for
Traders requiring a wide range of instruments or major indices, Traders outside Indonesia (no international regulatory coverage), Traders seeking advanced platform features or algorithmic trading
International traders, Traders requiring high transparency, Risk-averse beginners
Products & Funding
Instruments
--
Deposit methods
Withdrawal
Execution
Speed
Slippage
Swap cost
Company
Founded
2025-02-18
2019-03-13
Headquarters
Indonesia
Indonesia
Employees
0
0

✓ = stronger value on that row · good · caution · weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.

← Compare other brokers