Duplitrade vs INVAST
Independent side-by-side on safety (scam-risk, regulation, reviews) and selection (costs, products, funding, who it's best for). We charge brokers nothing.
✦ AI comparison Premium · soon
An independent AI take on which of these fits you — from the data, not opinions for sale. Launching soon.
Safer pick INVAST leads on safety — winning 2 of 2
trust metrics (lower scam-risk, stronger regulation). Check the selection rows for the best fit.
Safety & Trust
Scam-risk scoreⓘ lower = safer
75
✓12
Verdict
Severe
Low risk
Regulatedⓘ
No
Yes
Licenses
0
✓1
Tier-1 regulatorsⓘ
0
0
Trustpilot score
1.7
—
Reviews collected
37
—
Exit riskⓘ lower = safer
—
—
Known clonesⓘ
0
0
Regulator warnings
0
0
Cost & Accounts
Min deposit lower = easier to start
—
—
Max leverage
—
—
Min spread (best acct)
—
—
Commission
—
—
Cost grade
—
—
Account types
0
0
Best for
Suits
—
Japanese retail traders seeking regulated FX/CFD broker, Traders interested in automated trading solutions, Exchange-traded forex (Click365) with competitive commissions
Not for
Retail investors seeking reliable, regulated trading services, Traders who cannot afford to lose their entire capital, Beginners lured by promises of passive income
Non-Japanese residents (Japanese-only interface and regulation), Traders needing MetaTrader or third-party platforms, High-frequency traders requiring ultra-low latency (proprietary platform limitations)
Products & Funding
Instruments
—
—
Deposit methods
—
—
Withdrawal
—
—
Execution
Speed
—
—
Slippage
—
—
Swap cost
—
—
Company
Founded
2019-03-08
2018-12-17
Headquarters
🇯🇵 Japan
🇯🇵 Japan
Employees
0
58
✓ = stronger value on that row · ● good · ● caution · ● weak · "—" = not yet collected. Independent scoring, never for sale.