TRADEVIEW MARKETS

Tradeview Markets, operating under Tradeview LTD., is a brokerage firm headquartered in the Cayman Islands. It was established on 21 August 2020, though its parent company claims a history dating back to 2004. The firm provides forex and CFD trading services to a global client base of approximately 20,000 traders. According to its records, the broker is regulated by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) under a Derivatives Trading License (EP) with an offshore status.

Despite the CIMA license, the company description notes that it is currently not regulated, which may indicate that the license is not active or that the broker is not fully compliant. This contradiction raises caution. The broker does not accept US residents due to regulatory restrictions.

Tradeview Lists a single regulatory license: the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) Derivatives Trading License (EP). However, this is an offshore regulation, and CIMA’s oversight is generally considered less stringent than that of major regulators like the FCA or ASIC. The license status is listed as 'Offshore Regulation,' which may imply limited investor protection.

There is no evidence of authorization from any top-tier regulator. The broker’s own description states it is 'currently not regulated,' conflicting with the CIMA filing. This discrepancy suggests potential regulatory ambiguity that traders should weigh carefully.

The broker offers three account types: cTrader, XLev, and ILC. Both cTrader and XLev accounts require a minimum deposit of $100 and offer a maximum leverage of 1:400. The ILC account requires a higher minimum deposit of $1,000 and provides leverage up to 1:200. Leverage of 1:400 is aggressive and carries significant risk, especially for retail traders.

The broker does not disclose typical spreads or commissions in the known facts. Account features, base currencies, and supported funding methods are not specified. Traders should expect limited transparency on costs and conditions.

Tradeview Markets supports the cTrader platform and its proprietary XLev platform, alongside an ILC (Innovative Liquidity Connector) account type. cTrader is a popular third-party platform known for its advanced charting and execution. The broker also offers MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, as indicated by references on the website.

Available platforms include desktop, web, and mobile versions, catering to various trading styles. However, specific platform features for each account type are not detailed in the known records.

The exact range of instruments is not listed in the known facts. Based on the broker’s description, it likely offers forex, commodities, indices, and cryptocurrency CFDs, but this cannot be confirmed. Traders should seek current information directly from the broker.

The absence of a clear instrument list adds to the information gap, making it difficult to assess whether the broker meets a trader’s specific market needs.

Tradeview Markets appears to target retail and institutional traders globally, excluding US residents. The account tiers (cTrader and XLev at $100 minimum, ILC at $1,000) suggest appeal to both small and larger traders. The high leverage options may attract risk-tolerant speculators.

Given the limited regulatory oversight and contradictory statements about regulation, this broker is best suited for experienced traders who understand the risks of offshore entities and can conduct their own due diligence.

The FXCanary Scam Risk Score for Tradeview Markets is 44/100 (Guarded), indicating moderate risk. The main concerns are the offshore regulation, conflicting information about regulatory status, and the lack of independent user reviews. The broker’s description admits it is 'not regulated,' which contradicts the CIMA license on file.

Traders should be aware that CIMA does not provide the same level of compensation schemes or dispute resolution as major regulators. The high leverage of up to 1:400 amplifies both potential gains and losses. Without verified cost data and user feedback, the broker’s transparency is questionable.