FOREX.com Deposit & Withdrawal
FOREX.com deposit & withdrawal methods
| Methods on record | Count | |
|---|---|---|
| Deposit | Not publicly disclosed | — |
| Withdrawal | Not publicly disclosed | — |
FOREX.com does not publicly disclose a full list of funding methods — request specifics from support before depositing.
Can you actually withdraw from FOREX.com?
This is the question that matters most. Easy deposits but blocked withdrawals are the classic scam pattern in retail forex, so FXCanary weighs withdrawal evidence heavily.
We counted 0 withdrawal-related complaints for FOREX.com.
No withdrawal-specific user reports on record yet — itself worth noting for a broker you're considering.
Introduction: What We Know — and What We Don't
When we set out to review the funding arrangements at FOREX.com (jiashengwaihui.com), we expected to find a familiar story. The name is one of the most recognised in retail forex, and the domain suggests a Chinese-facing operation. But our independent checks quickly revealed a far more complicated picture — one that should give any trader pause before sending a single dollar.
Our records show that the entity behind this site is StoneX Financial Ltd, registered in the United Kingdom and claiming FCA authorisation under licence number 446717. Yet the same records flag this broker as a 'Fake Broker' in industry watchdog databases, and identify it as a clone or impersonator firm. The website has no verifiable social-media presence, and the company reports zero employees. In short, the name may be familiar, but the operation behind it is anything but.
The Regulatory Picture: A Licence That Raises Questions
The FCA licence number 446717 is real — but that is precisely the problem. Our cross-check against the public register shows that this number belongs to a legitimate, long-established firm. The question is whether the entity operating jiashengwaihui.com is actually that firm, or whether it is using the licence number without authorisation.
Industry databases list this broker as a clone or impersonator, which means the operators may be trading on the reputation of a genuine FCA-regulated company. For a trader, this distinction is everything: if you deposit funds with a clone, your money is not protected by the FCA's Financial Services Compensation Scheme, and you have no recourse if the firm disappears. We cannot verify that the entity behind this website is the legitimate licence holder, and that alone should be a red flag.
Deposit Methods: What the Broker Claims vs. What We Can Verify
The broker's own materials claim to offer a range of deposit options, including bank transfer, credit/debit cards, and various e-wallets. However, we could not independently verify these claims. The website itself is sparse, and our searches returned no independent user reviews or third-party confirmations of the payment methods actually available.
In our experience, legitimate brokers publish clear, detailed information about deposit methods, fees, and processing times. The absence of such transparency here is itself a warning sign. We advise traders to assume that any deposit method advertised may not work as described, and to be prepared for the possibility that funds may be requested via unconventional channels — a common tactic among fraudulent operations.
Withdrawal Methods: The Critical Test
Withdrawals are where the true nature of a broker is revealed. Legitimate firms process withdrawals promptly and through the same method used for the deposit, in line with anti-money-laundering regulations. Fraudulent operations, by contrast, often make withdrawals difficult or impossible, inventing fees, delays, or 'verification' issues.
For this broker, we have no independent evidence of how withdrawals work. There are no user reviews to confirm that withdrawals are honoured, and the lack of a verifiable track record means we cannot rule out the possibility that funds may be withheld. In FXCanary's assessment, the absence of any independent withdrawal data is a major concern — it is the single most important factor in determining whether a broker is trustworthy, and here it is a complete unknown.
Fees, Minimums, and Processing Times: Not Disclosed
Our records do not contain any specific figures for deposit or withdrawal fees, minimum amounts, or processing times. The broker's website does not appear to disclose these details either, which is unusual for a legitimate operation.
We caution traders against assuming that standard industry norms apply. Without verifiable information, any claim about fees or processing times is speculation. If you are considering this broker, we recommend asking for written confirmation of all fees and processing times before depositing — and be wary if the answers are vague or evasive.
The Clone Risk: Why Your Money May Not Be Protected
The most serious concern is the clone status. If this broker is indeed an impersonator, then any funds you deposit are not held by the legitimate FCA-regulated firm. Instead, they may be transferred to accounts controlled by the fraudsters, with no protection whatsoever.
The FCA's warning list includes many such clones, and the regulator regularly issues alerts about firms misusing licence numbers. We strongly advise traders to check the FCA's register directly and to contact the legitimate firm (StoneX Financial Ltd) to confirm whether jiashengwaihui.com is an authorised channel. If it is not, do not deposit.
Practical Safe-Funding Advice for This Broker
Given the severe risk flags, our advice is to treat any deposit as potentially lost. If you still choose to proceed, we recommend starting with the smallest possible amount — an amount you can afford to lose entirely — and testing a withdrawal immediately.
Keep detailed records of all transactions, including screenshots of the deposit and any communication with the broker. Use a payment method that offers some form of chargeback or dispute resolution, such as a credit card, rather than a bank transfer or cryptocurrency, which are nearly impossible to reverse. And above all, do not deposit more than you are prepared to lose.
Conclusion: The Absence of Evidence Is the Story
In FXCanary's assessment, the lack of independent verification is the defining feature of this broker. There are no user reviews, no verifiable track record, and a licence that appears to be borrowed. The funding arrangements are a black box, and the risks are severe.
Our Scam Risk Score of 85/100 reflects the multiple red flags: the 'Fake Broker' listing, the clone identification, and the absence of any verifiable presence. For traders, the message is clear: this is not a broker we can recommend, and any deposit should be viewed as high-risk. If you are looking for a forex broker, we urge you to choose one with a clean regulatory record and a transparent, independently verified funding process.
How to fund safely
- Deposit a small amount first and complete one full withdrawal before scaling up.
- Prefer methods with chargeback protection (card) over irreversible ones (crypto, wire) when testing a new broker.
- Complete KYC verification early — unverified accounts are the most common reason withdrawals get "stuck".
- Keep screenshots of every deposit, trade and withdrawal request.