Brokers  /  FIN e-Art

FIN e-Art

High riskForex / CFD broker
🇨🇳 China · 2-5 years · since 2023-02-13 · FIN e-Art
Unregulated
Visit site ↗
Independent ratingshow third parties score this broker
WikiFX1.44/10
Trustpilot/5
Forex Peace Army/5
🛡️ Been scammed or can’t withdraw from FIN e-Art? Our free assistant writes up your case and shows exactly what to do next →
🇺🇸
No sign that FIN e-Art actively operates in your country (United States). If you were solicited from here, be extra cautious — it may be an unregulated approach or a clone.
54
High risk
Scam Risk Scoremonitored · 2026-07-28
Lower riskHigher risk
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • No verifiable website or social-media presence
How this score is calculated — view the open algorithm

A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.

FactorScoreWeight
Regulation & licensing8535%
Company age4515%
Clone / impersonation012%
Withdrawal & exposure complaints012%
Offshore registration458%
Transparency (site/info/social)10010%

Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.

Company
Legal nameFIN e-Art
Headquarters🇨🇳 China
Founded2023-02-13
Years operating2-5 years
Employees0
Official websitefineartme.com
Trading conditions
Avg execution speed0 ms
Avg slippage0
Swap rating
Trading cost rating
Monitored traders0
Monitored orders0
Funding & instruments
Deposit methods · --
Withdrawal methods · --
Instruments--

Regulation & licenses · 0

No valid regulatory license found — high caution advised.

Account types · 3

AccountMax leverageMin. depositMin. spreadCommissionEA
Professional1:500$ 25 000----
Trader1:500$ 5 000----
Start 1:100$ 150----

Review analysis AI

FIN e-Art presents a clear risk due to its unregulated status and lack of public information. The high-leverage offerings and significant minimum deposits intensify the danger for retail traders. Our elevated scam risk score of 54/100 underscores that this broker should be approached with extreme caution, if at all.

Best for
  • Experienced traders seeking high leverage with very high risk tolerance
  • Traders willing to deposit $25,000+ for a Professional account
Not for
  • Traders requiring regulatory protection or compensation schemes
  • Beginners or retail investors with limited capital
  • Anyone preferring transparent, well‑documented brokers
Period:

Real user reviews

Similar brokers

About FIN e-Art

Overview

FIN e-Art is a financial services entity registered in China, established on 13 February 2023. The broker presents itself as a provider of leveraged trading services, offering three distinct account tiers aimed at different capital levels.

As of this review, the broker does not have a publicly available official website, and its operational presence remains opaque. No information regarding trading platforms, instruments, or funding methods has been disseminated through publicly accessible channels.

Regulation and Licensing

FIN e-Art is not regulated by any known financial authority. Our records confirm that no regulatory licences are on file for this broker, which places it outside the oversight of major regulators such as the FCA, CySEC, or ASIC.

The absence of regulation is a significant risk factor for traders, as it means there are no third‑party safeguards or compensation schemes in place. Potential clients should exercise extreme caution when considering deposits with an unregulated entity.

Account Types

FIN e-Art offers three account types: Professional, Trader, and Start. The Professional account requires a minimum deposit of $25,000 and offers a maximum leverage of 1:500. The Trader account has a $5,000 minimum deposit with the same 1:500 leverage. The Start account lowers the entry barrier to $150 but restricts maximum leverage to 1:100.

This tiered structure suggests the broker targets both high‑net‑worth individuals and smaller retail traders. However, the high minimum deposits for the upper tiers may limit accessibility for many retail participants.

Leverage and Risk

Maximum leverage across the Professional and Trader accounts is 1:500, which is considered high risk and is banned or restricted in many regulated jurisdictions. The Start account offers a more moderate 1:100 leverage.

High leverage amplifies both gains and losses, and without regulatory oversight, traders have no recourse if the broker engages in unfair practices or mismanages funds. FXCanary’s elevated risk score of 54/100 reflects these concerns.

Transparency and Public Information

FIN e-Art’s online presence is minimal. No official website, social media accounts, or marketing materials have been identified through standard industry database searches. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to verify the broker’s claims regarding its services or corporate background.

Potential clients are advised that the absence of verifiable information is a red flag. Legitimate brokers typically maintain a clear digital footprint and provide detailed disclosures about their operations.

Geographic Targeting

The broker is registered in China, and it is likely that its services are directed at Chinese‑speaking markets. However, without a website or client portal, the exact geographic reach cannot be confirmed.

Traders from jurisdictions with strict forex regulations should be particularly wary, as the broker may not comply with local licensing requirements.

Conclusion

FIN e-Art is a newly established, unregulated broker with an elevated risk profile. While its account structures are typical of leveraged forex/CFD brokers, the total lack of regulatory oversight and public information makes it unsuitable for cautious traders.

FXCanary recommends that only experienced traders with a high risk tolerance consider such an entity, and even then only after conducting independent due diligence. For most retail traders, fully regulated alternatives should be prioritised.

Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full FIN e-Art review