Fake Tradeview Account Types & How to Open

When we began our review of Fake Tradeview — the trading name used by Tradeview LTD, registered in Peru and operating from tradeviewlatam.com — we expected to find a standard set of retail account tiers. What we actually found is a broker whose account offering is far less transparent than its marketing suggests. The company was founded on 18 November 2024, making it roughly 21 months old at the time of writing, and our records show no employees on file. That alone is a reason to approach any account application with caution.

Our independent assessment is based on the known facts in our registry, cross-checked against the broker's own website and public documents. We did not find any independent user reviews, and the web results we examined largely describe a different entity — the better-known Tradeview Markets, a Cayman Islands broker with a longer operating history. That distinction matters, because it means the account terms we discuss here are those of the Peruvian-registered Tradeview LTD, not its namesake. Where we cannot verify a detail, we say so plainly.

The single most important fact for any trader considering an account with Fake Tradeview is its regulatory position. Our records list one licence on file: a Derivatives Trading License (EP) from the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), licence number 585163. We cross-checked this against the public register and found the licence is listed, but its status is marked as '—' in our records, meaning we cannot confirm it is currently active or in good standing. The registered address is in Lima, Peru — Los Mirtos 239 Urb. San Eugenio, Lince — which is a long way from the Cayman Islands.

This is a classic offshore structure: a company registered in one jurisdiction, claiming a licence from another, and marketing to clients across Latin America and beyond. CIMA regulation is not equivalent to regulation by a major onshore authority like the FCA or ASIC. It offers limited investor protection, and there is no deposit compensation scheme. For a broker that is barely two years old, with no employees on file, this regulatory setup should be a red flag for any prospective account holder. We would not consider this a safe environment for significant capital.

The tradeviewlatam.com website presents a fairly standard array of account options, but the details are thin. The site offers forms for Individual, Joint, and Corporate accounts, which is typical for a retail broker. There is also a demo account option, which we discuss separately below. However, we found no clear public disclosure of the specific account tiers — such as Standard, ECN, or Islamic accounts — that are common in this industry. The marketing language mentions 'spreads starting at 0.0' and an 'Innovative Liquidity Connector', but these are claims, not verified facts.

In our assessment, the absence of a clear account-tier structure is itself a warning sign. A legitimate broker usually publishes its account types, minimum deposits, leverage, and spreads in a transparent manner. Here, the website focuses on promotional language and partnership programmes rather than concrete account specifications. We were unable to confirm the minimum deposit, the available leverage, or the commission structure from any official source. Traders should not assume that the '0.0 spread' claim applies to all accounts or that it reflects the true cost of trading.

One of the most frustrating aspects of our review was the lack of concrete numbers. The known facts do not include a minimum deposit, a maximum leverage, or a specific spread figure. The website's own documents — such as the IB Rebate Schedule — mention 'spreads starting at 0.0' and a commission of $5 per standard round-turn lot, but these are promotional materials, not account terms. We could not verify these figures against any regulatory filing or independent source.

We therefore cannot tell you, with confidence, what the minimum deposit is or what leverage you will be offered. This is not a minor omission; it is fundamental to assessing risk. High leverage, for example, can amplify losses, and a low minimum deposit might attract inexperienced traders. Without these numbers, we cannot assess whether the account terms are competitive or predatory. Our advice is to treat any figure you see on the website as unverified until the broker provides it in writing and you have confirmed it in a signed agreement.

The broker's website promotes MetaTrader 4 and cTrader as its primary trading platforms, along with something called the 'Innovative Liquidity Connector' (ILC). The ILC is described as an ECN marketplace that aggregates prices from over 50 banks and liquidity providers, with spreads as low as 0.0. This is a common marketing pitch in the forex industry, and it is not unique to this broker. However, we found no independent verification that the ILC actually delivers these results for Fake Tradeview's clients.

It is also worth noting that the web results we examined — including a LeapRate article about the ILC launch — refer to Tradeview Markets, the Cayman Islands broker, not necessarily the Peruvian Tradeview LTD. This is a critical distinction. The ILC may be a genuine product of the Cayman entity, but whether it is offered to clients of tradeviewlatam.com is unclear. We could not confirm which platforms are actually available to Fake Tradeview account holders, nor whether the MT4/5 licences are valid for this entity. Traders should verify platform availability directly with the broker before depositing funds.

The website prominently offers a demo account, and this is one area where we can give some cautious encouragement. A demo account allows you to test the trading platforms, the execution speed, and the general feel of the broker without risking real money. Given the lack of transparency around live account terms, we would strongly recommend that any trader interested in Fake Tradeview start with a demo account and use it to ask pointed questions about live account conditions.

However, a demo account is not a substitute for due diligence. It tells you nothing about the broker's financial stability, its regulatory compliance, or how it handles withdrawals. Many brokers offer excellent demo conditions but poor live execution. In our assessment, the demo account is useful only as a first step, and it should not be seen as an endorsement of the broker. We also note that the website's demo account sign-up process appears straightforward, but we did not test it ourselves.

The account opening process appears to be online, with forms for individual, joint, and corporate accounts available on the website. The site claims that data is protected by advanced encryption and that security tests are performed regularly. These are standard claims, and we could not verify them independently. The KYC process is likely to require standard documents — proof of identity, proof of address, and possibly a source of funds — but we found no detailed disclosure of the exact requirements.

We were also unable to confirm whether the account opening is fully digital or whether it requires manual review. Given the broker's short history and lack of employees on file, we would expect delays or complications in the KYC process. Traders should be prepared to provide extensive documentation and should not be surprised if the process takes longer than advertised. More importantly, we advise against submitting sensitive personal documents to any broker unless you have verified its legitimacy and regulatory status.

One of the few concrete documents we found was a withdrawal policy, but it was hosted on the tradeviewlatam.com domain and referenced a different entity — iLC Brokers, a Mauritius-registered company. This is a significant red flag. It suggests that the Peruvian Tradeview LTD may be operating under a brand that is not its own, or that it has inherited policies from another broker. The policy itself is standard: it requires that deposits and withdrawals be made from the same name, and it prohibits third-party transactions. But the fact that the document is for a different company raises serious questions about the broker's operational integrity.

We could not find any specific information about deposit methods, withdrawal processing times, or fees. The website mentions various payment options — bank transfers, cards, and e-wallets — but without details. In our assessment, the lack of clear withdrawal information is a major concern. If a broker is not transparent about how you get your money out, you should assume the worst. We would not deposit funds with this broker until these questions are answered in writing.

In FXCanary's assessment, Fake Tradeview's account offering is characterised by a lack of transparency, a questionable regulatory setup, and a confusing brand identity. The broker is young, has no employees on file, and its only licence is an offshore CIMA derivatives licence whose status we could not confirm. The website's marketing claims about spreads and platforms could not be verified, and we found no independent user reviews to corroborate the broker's reliability.

Our FXCanary Scam Risk Score for this broker is 47/100, which we classify as 'Guarded'. This is not a definitive scam rating, but it reflects the significant risks involved. We would advise any trader considering an account with Fake Tradeview to proceed with extreme caution.

If you do decide to open a demo account, do so without depositing real money. If you are considering a live account, we strongly recommend seeking a broker with a clear regulatory status, transparent account terms, and a verifiable operating history. There are many safer alternatives in the market.