Equiti Global Markets Ltd Deposit & Withdrawal

When a broker has no independent review record, the funding page is where a cautious trader should start — and stop. In FXCanary's assessment, Equiti Global Markets Ltd is a CySEC-regulated Cypriot investment firm operating under the brand Equiti Capital, with its official domain at equiti-capital.com. Our records show a single licence, a CySEC CIF licence numbered 415/22, with status Authorised in Cyprus. That is the firm's regulatory anchor, and it is the only hard fact we can stand behind when it comes to moving money in and out of an account.

What we cannot verify is almost everything else about the day-to-day funding experience. The broker's own website describes a bespoke institutional liquidity service aimed at professional clients and eligible counterparties, not a retail-facing deposit page with published minimums, fees and processing times. There is no independent user feedback, no third-party withdrawal reviews, and no public record of a client complaining about a stuck payment. That absence of evidence is not evidence of a problem — but it is also not evidence of a smooth ride. For a trader, the honest takeaway is that funding this broker means funding a relationship that has not yet been stress-tested in public.

Before any money moves, the licence is the thing to check. Our records list Equiti Global Markets Ltd as authorised by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under licence number 415/22, with a company registration number that appears in public records as HE415535. We cross-checked the licence against the public register and the status is Authorised. That means the firm is subject to CySEC's client money rules, which require segregation of client funds from the firm's own operating capital, and to the Investor Compensation Fund, which offers a limited safety net for eligible retail clients.

We should be precise about what that protection does and does not cover. Segregation means your funds should not be used to pay the broker's bills, but it does not guarantee that a withdrawal will be processed quickly or without friction. The compensation fund covers certain losses if the firm fails, but it has limits and does not cover poor execution, disputed charges or a withdrawal that is simply slow. In our view, the CySEC licence is a meaningful floor — it is not a ceiling that removes the need for caution.

The funding picture only makes sense once you understand the client base. Equiti Capital's own materials describe a prime-of-prime liquidity provider offering bespoke CFD liquidity to institutions, with connectivity to platforms like PrimeXM, oneZero, Gold-i and FXCubic. The regulatory page is explicit: products are directed to clients classified as Professional and Eligible Counterparties only. That is a very different proposition from a retail broker with a standard deposit page, a welcome bonus and a one-click withdrawal button.

For a professional or institutional client, funding is typically arranged through a dedicated account manager, often by bank transfer, and the terms — minimums, fees, settlement times — are negotiated rather than published. For a retail trader who has found this entity by name, the mismatch is a red flag in itself. If you are not a professional client, you may not be the intended customer at all, and the funding terms that apply to you may be unclear or unfavourable. Our advice: confirm your client classification before you send a single euro.

We searched the broker's public materials and found no published list of deposit methods, no minimum deposit figure, and no stated processing times. The website emphasises bespoke solutions and direct contact with a Limassol-based team, which strongly suggests that funding is handled on a case-by-case basis rather than through a standardised retail flow. For institutional clients, bank wire is the most likely route, and it is the method we would expect for any professional account.

What we can say with confidence is that the broker does not appear to offer the usual retail menu of credit cards, e-wallets and instant payment schemes. That is not a criticism — it is a reflection of the client base. But it does mean that a retail trader expecting to fund with a card or a Skrill transfer will likely be disappointed, and may struggle to find a clear answer on the website. If you cannot find a published deposit method, treat that as a sign that this broker is not built for you.

Withdrawal reliability is the single most important question for any trader, and for this broker we have to answer honestly: we do not know. There is no independent review record, no user-reported withdrawal experience, and no public complaints that we can find. The broker's own materials do not disclose withdrawal processing times, fees or minimum withdrawal amounts. In the absence of any verifiable data, we will not invent a narrative of reliability — or of failure.

What we can do is give you a framework for testing the broker yourself. The first and most important test is to make a small withdrawal early in the relationship, before you deposit significant sums. If the broker cannot return a modest amount within a reasonable time, that tells you everything you need to know. Keep records of every deposit, every withdrawal request and every communication with the support team. If a dispute arises, those records are your evidence — and they are the only evidence you will have, because there is no public track record to rely on.

The broker's website mentions tight spreads and low margins, with examples such as margins starting from 0.2% on FX and from 1% on selected commodities, and spreads from 2.2 cents on USOil. We note these figures because they appear in the broker's own marketing, but we will not present them as verified facts. They are promotional claims, not audited numbers, and they may not reflect the actual costs you face on your specific account. The same applies to any mention of spreads or commissions in third-party reviews — we have not verified those figures against the broker's live pricing.

For funding specifically, the broker does not publish deposit or withdrawal fees. In our experience, institutional accounts often pass on bank charges, and international wires can incur intermediary fees that are not visible at the point of payment. Ask your account manager for a written schedule of all fees before you fund. If they cannot or will not provide one, that is a cautionary signal. A reputable firm should be able to tell you exactly what it costs to move money in and out.

Because this broker has no independent review record, we recommend a conservative approach to funding. Start with an amount you are prepared to lose entirely — not because we believe the broker is a scam, but because no independent evidence exists to reassure you otherwise. Our FXCanary Scam Risk Score for this entity is 34 out of 100, which we classify as 'Guarded'. That is not an accusation of fraud; it is a reflection of the fact that the broker has no verifiable website or social-media presence in our records, and no public track record to assess.

Before you deposit, verify the licence directly on the CySEC register using the number 415/22. Confirm that the entity name matches Equiti Global Markets Ltd and that the status is Authorised. Then make a test withdrawal early, keep meticulous records, and use a payment method that offers some form of recourse if things go wrong — a credit card or a bank transfer to a segregated client account is preferable to a wire to an unknown beneficiary. If anything feels off, walk away. There are plenty of well-reviewed brokers with a long public history; this one is not yet one of them.

Equiti Global Markets Ltd is a CySEC-regulated firm with a legitimate licence and a clear institutional focus. That is a real fact, and it distinguishes this broker from the many unregulated operations we see. But regulation is not the same as a clean bill of health for retail traders. The broker's own materials target professional clients, its funding terms are not publicly disclosed, and there is no independent review record to tell you what it is actually like to deposit and withdraw.

In FXCanary's assessment, this is a broker to approach with caution and only if you fit the professional-client profile. If you are a retail trader, we would strongly suggest looking elsewhere — at a broker with published funding terms, a visible user community and a track record of timely withdrawals. If you are a professional client, do your due diligence: verify the licence, get the fee schedule in writing, and test a small withdrawal early. The absence of evidence is not a reason to assume the worst, but it is a reason to demand more before you commit your capital.