Brokers  /  DangKang

DangKang

Moderate riskForex / CFD broker
🇳🇿 New Zealand · 5-10 years · since 2019-09-02 · DangKang International Group Limited.
Unregulated
Visit site ↗
Independent ratingshow third parties score this broker
WikiFX1.57/10
Trustpilot/5
Forex Peace Army/5
🛡️ Been scammed or can’t withdraw from DangKang? Our free assistant writes up your case and shows exactly what to do next →
🇺🇸
No sign that DangKang actively operates in your country (United States). If you were solicited from here, be extra cautious — it may be an unregulated approach or a clone.
48
Moderate risk
Scam Risk Scoremonitored · 2026-07-28
Lower riskHigher risk
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • No verifiable website or social-media presence
How this score is calculated — view the open algorithm

A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.

FactorScoreWeight
Regulation & licensing8535%
Company age2215%
Clone / impersonation012%
Withdrawal & exposure complaints012%
Offshore registration458%
Transparency (site/info/social)7510%

Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.

Company
Legal nameDangKang International Group Limited.
Headquarters🇳🇿 New Zealand
Founded2019-09-02
Years operating5-10 years
Employees0
Official websitednw.dk-tnt.com
Trading conditions
Avg execution speed0 ms
Avg slippage0
Swap rating
Trading cost rating
Monitored traders0
Monitored orders0
Funding & instruments
Deposit methods
Withdrawal methods
Instruments

Regulation & licenses · 0

No valid regulatory license found — high caution advised.

Review analysis AI

DangKang is an unregistered broker with a questionable operational history. The lack of regulatory oversight and limited public information make it a high-risk choice for traders.

Not for
  • traders seeking regulated brokers
  • investors requiring transparency
Period:

Real user reviews

Similar brokers

About DangKang

Company Overview

DangKang is a brokerage entity registered in New Zealand, with a reported founding date of September 2, 2019. The company states it began operations in May 2005, although official registration records indicate a later establishment. DangKang operates under the domain en.dk-tnt.com and promotes itself as a provider of online trading services.

In FXCanary's assessment, the broker's regulatory status is a critical point of caution. Our records show no valid regulatory licences from any recognised financial authority. This absence means that traders are not protected by any regulatory compensation scheme or oversight mechanism, which significantly elevates the risk profile.

Regulatory Status

DangKang is classified as an unregulated broker. The company has no registered licences with any major financial regulator such as the FCA, ASIC, CySEC, or FMA. The lack of regulation means that the broker is not required to adhere to standard investor protection measures, including segregation of client funds, regular financial reporting, or compliance audits.

Traders considering this broker should be aware that they are entrusting their funds to an entity with no external oversight. This is a significant red flag, as unregulated brokers often operate with lower transparency and may not have adequate safeguards in place to protect client interests.

Trading Platform and Instruments

According to the company's own information, DangKang offers the MetaTrader 5 (MT5) trading platform. MT5 is a widely used platform known for its advanced charting tools, automated trading capabilities, and support for multiple asset classes. However, the specific range of tradable instruments—such as forex pairs, CFDs on indices, commodities, or cryptocurrencies—is not clearly detailed in the available records.

The reliance on a single platform, while common among smaller brokers, may limit traders' flexibility. Additionally, without verified information about execution quality, slippage policies, or order types, traders have limited grounds to evaluate the broker's trading environment.

Account Types and Funding

No independent data is available regarding the account types offered by DangKang. The broker may offer standard, mini, or Islamic accounts, but these details have not been confirmed from reliable sources. Similarly, deposit and withdrawal methods are not publicly documented, making it difficult for potential clients to assess convenience and cost-effectiveness.

The absence of transparent information on account terms and funding is a common characteristic of brokers with low online presence. Traders are advised to exercise extreme caution and seek clarity directly from the broker before committing any funds.

Target Audience and Suitability

DangKang appears to target retail traders, particularly those who may be less experienced or based in regions where regulatory scrutiny is less stringent. The broker's offering of MT5 suggests an attempt to attract traders familiar with the MetaQuotes ecosystem.

Given the lack of regulation and limited publicly available information, DangKang is not suitable for traders who prioritise security and regulatory protection. It may only appeal to those willing to take on a high level of risk, but even then, the absence of verified operational history is a major drawback.

Risk Considerations

The most prominent risk factor for DangKang is its unregulated status. Without a regulatory licence, there is no independent authority to oversee the broker's conduct or resolve disputes. Additionally, the broker's low FXCanary Scam Risk Score of 48/100 (Guarded) indicates a moderate-to-high risk of potential issues, including misappropriation of funds or operational irregularities.

Traders should also consider the lack of verifiable information on the broker's incorporation date and history. The discrepancy between the claimed start date (2005) and the registration date (2019) raises questions about transparency. In the event of a dispute or financial loss, clients may have limited legal recourse, especially if the broker is based in a jurisdiction with weak enforcement.

Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full DangKang review