D.T. Direct Investment Hub Ltd

D.T. Direct Investment Hub Ltd is a Cyprus-registered investment company whose official website is given as avatrade.com. The corporate name is narrower than the consumer-facing domain, a pattern often seen among online brokers that operate under a brand rather than the legal entity name. Our records do not include the company's founding date, so the length of its operating history is not independently confirmed.

The company's registration in Cyprus places it within the European Economic Area regulatory framework, subject to the supervision of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). As a legal entity it is distinct from the trading brand it fronts, and traders who open accounts through avatrade.com should verify that the counterparty named in their account agreement matches the regulated entity.

The only regulator on file for D.T. Direct Investment Hub Ltd is CySEC, under a single CIF licence with number 347/17, which is listed as Authorised. A CySEC CIF, or Cyprus Investment Firm, is a regulated category that permits the firm to provide investment services, including the execution of leveraged derivatives such as contracts for difference and spot forex. Because the licence is currently Authorised, the entity is not in a suspicious or revoked status in the records we hold.

Holding a CySEC CIF also implies obligations around capital adequacy, client asset segregation and conduct reporting, although the granular details of the firm's compliance are not part of the public data in our file. Traders should still check the live CySEC register, since regulatory status can change and licence number 347/17 is the reference to look up. The licence itself is genuinely present on paper, but it does not by itself tell an investor about execution quality, fees or platform reliability.

The official domain and the CIF licence indicate that D.T. Direct Investment Hub Ltd operates as a retail brokerage rather than a bank, money-transfer firm or pure securities exchange. FXCanary classifies the entity under the retail FX/CFD category, meaning leveraged trading products are the core offering for individual clients. That fits the avatrade.com domain, which is a consumer-facing online trading site.

Our known-facts file does not list specific account tiers, trading platforms, instrument lists or minimum deposit sizes. We do not carry verified figures for spreads, commissions or leverage and cannot responsibly repeat any numbers from external sources. Clients interested in these details would need to consult the broker's own website or account documentation, with the caveat that the legal entity's standalone web presence is limited.

FXCanary's Scam Risk Score for D.T. Direct Investment Hub Ltd is 34 out of 100, which places the broker in the 'Guarded' band. The risk flag recorded alongside the score is 'No verifiable website or social-media presence.' This may appear contradictory given the official domain avatrade.com, but the flag refers to the legal entity name: a search for 'D.T. Direct Investment Hub Ltd' does not surface a dedicated company site or active social media accounts.

The absence of a standalone web footprint is common among brokers that operate purely through a trading brand, but it still complicates independent due diligence. In FXCanary's assessment, the main uncertainty is not whether a licence exists — it clearly does — but how much operational transparency the company offers under its registered name. A guarded score is not an accusation of fraud; it is a signal that traders should complete their own verification before depositing.

For a trader evaluating D.T. Direct Investment Hub Ltd, the first step is to confirm the counterparty name on the account agreement or deposit page and match it to the CySEC licence number 347/17. The second is to verify that the licence is still in good standing on the official CySEC register. The third is to review the terms, fees and product documentation directly from the broker rather than relying on third-party descriptions.

Because the records contain no founding date and no independent account or platform details, a conservative approach is appropriate. The entity is not unregulated — the licence is very much present — but the information asymmetry around its operations is higher than for brokers that publish extensive official documentation. Traders who prefer full public transparency on every operational detail may find the thin footprint unsatisfying.