AN Markets Deposit & Withdrawal

When a broker has no independent review record and no verifiable website, the funding page becomes the most important page on our site. For AN Markets, a company registered in Australia and founded in June 2023, the absence of a public-facing domain is a red flag that shapes every piece of advice we give about moving money.

Our records show AN Markets holds two licences on file: an NBRB Forex Trading License (EP) with licence number 193583860 in Belarus, and an FSA Derivatives Trading License (EP) with licence number SD018 in Seychelles. Neither licence carries a status in our database, and we could not verify any active website or social media presence. In FXCanary's assessment, this is a broker where the funding process is entirely unverified — and that is exactly why you need a cautious approach before sending a single dollar.

We searched for official documentation on AN Markets' deposit methods, but found nothing. The broker's own domain is not listed in our records, and no independent review has ever confirmed which payment channels are actually offered. This is not a case of missing details — it is a case of no verifiable information at all.

In the absence of official disclosure, we cannot confirm whether AN Markets accepts bank wire, credit cards, e-wallets, or cryptocurrency. Industry databases list the company as registered in Australia, but that does not tell us anything about its payment infrastructure. For a trader, this means the first step is not choosing a deposit method — it is asking the broker directly for a written list of accepted payment options, and then verifying that the response comes from a domain you can independently confirm belongs to the company.

Withdrawal methods are the mirror image of deposits, and for AN Markets we have the same problem: nothing is disclosed. No independent review has ever documented a successful withdrawal, and no user has come forward to describe the process. This is not evidence of fraud, but it is a significant gap in the information a cautious trader needs.

Our advice is to treat the withdrawal process as the single most important test of this broker. Before you deposit any meaningful amount, ask for the withdrawal policy in writing: which methods are available, what the processing time is, and whether there are any fees. If the broker cannot or will not provide this in a clear, written format, that is a warning sign. A legitimate broker should be able to explain how you get your money back before you ever send it.

We found no disclosed information about deposit or withdrawal fees, nor any processing time estimates. In our records, there are no figures for minimum deposits, maximum withdrawals, or currency conversion costs. This is not unusual for a broker with no public website, but it is a serious limitation for anyone planning to fund an account.

Without official numbers, we cannot tell you whether AN Markets charges a flat fee per withdrawal, a percentage, or nothing at all. We also cannot confirm whether withdrawals are processed within hours, days, or weeks. In FXCanary's assessment, this lack of transparency is itself a risk factor. A broker that cannot publish basic funding terms is a broker that is not ready for retail clients — or worse, a broker that prefers to keep its terms vague.

AN Markets lists two licences on file, but neither carries a status in our database. The NBRB licence (number 193583860) is from Belarus, and the FSA licence (number SD018) is from Seychelles. These are not the sort of licences that give a retail trader strong regulatory protection — Seychelles in particular is known for light-touch oversight.

We cross-checked the licence numbers against the public registers where possible, but our records do not show an active status. This means we cannot confirm that the licences are currently valid or that the broker is in good standing with either regulator. For funding purposes, this matters because a licensed broker is more likely to follow standard practices like segregating client funds. With AN Markets, we cannot verify that this is the case.

Given the lack of verifiable information, we recommend a conservative approach. Start with the smallest deposit you are comfortable losing — treat it as a test, not an investment. Use a payment method that offers some form of recourse, such as a credit card, rather than an irreversible method like cryptocurrency or a wire transfer to an unknown account.

Before you deposit, ask for the broker's legal entity name, registered address, and a copy of its licence. Verify that the payment recipient matches the legal entity. Keep a record of every communication, including screenshots of the deposit page and the transaction receipt. If anything feels off, stop. The cost of a small test deposit is far lower than the cost of losing a large sum to an unverified broker.

The most important habit for any trader using a new broker is to test a withdrawal early. After your first deposit, request a withdrawal of a small amount — even if you do not need the money. This serves two purposes: it confirms that the withdrawal process works, and it gives you a sense of the broker's responsiveness.

For AN Markets, this test is essential because there is no independent record of any withdrawal ever succeeding. If the broker delays, asks for unnecessary documents, or imposes unexpected fees, you have learned a valuable lesson at minimal cost. If the withdrawal goes through smoothly, you have gained a small piece of evidence that the broker may be legitimate. Either way, you are better informed than before.

Several red flags are already present in our records: no verifiable website, no social media presence, and a risk score of 43/100, which we classify as 'Guarded'. The absence of a website is particularly concerning because it makes it impossible to verify the broker's claims or to contact them through a channel you can independently confirm.

Watch for additional red flags during the funding process. If the broker asks you to deposit to a personal bank account or a cryptocurrency wallet that is not in the company's name, that is a major warning sign. If the broker pressures you to deposit more before you have tested a withdrawal, that is another. And if the broker's customer support cannot answer basic questions about fees and processing times, you should walk away.

AN Markets is a broker with no independent review record, no verifiable website, and licences that we cannot confirm as active. In FXCanary's assessment, this is not a broker we can recommend for funding at this time. The lack of transparency around deposits and withdrawals is a fundamental problem.

If you still choose to proceed, do so with the smallest possible deposit and a clear plan to test a withdrawal early. Keep records of everything. And remember that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence — but in the world of forex brokers, it is a reason to be very, very careful. We will update this page as soon as independent information becomes available.