Aibos AG Account Types & How to Open

FXCanary's investigation into the account offering of Aibos AG began with the broker's official domain, aibos.ch. What should have been a routine check for account tiers, minimum deposits, and platform details instead revealed a complete information void. The domain does not host a functioning website, and we were unable to locate any verifiable account-related information through any other official channel.

This absence is not merely inconvenient—it is deeply alarming. In a legitimate broker‑client relationship, transparency around account terms is a foundational requirement. It allows traders to assess costs, risks, and suitability before committing funds. Aibos AG offers none of that, and our subsequent checks against regulatory databases and industry records only deepened our concern.

The vast majority of forex and CFD brokers, whether highly regulated or loosely overseen, structure their offerings into distinct account tiers. A typical lineup might include a Standard account with wider spreads and no commission, a Raw Spread or ECN account with tighter pricing and a per‑lot commission, and a VIP tier for high‑volume traders. Each tier usually carries a clearly stated minimum deposit, leverage cap, and execution model.

For Aibos AG, we found none of this. There is no mention of a Standard, Premium, or Islamic account. No Swap‑Free option, no corporate or joint account structure. Even the most basic categorisation is missing. This extraordinary opacity means potential clients have zero ability to compare what they are being offered with industry norms or even to understand what kind of trading conditions they might face.

In our experience, a broker that refuses to publicise its account types is often one that tailors terms arbitrarily on a client‑by‑client basis—rarely in the client's favour.

The minimum initial deposit is perhaps the single most sought‑after figure for a new trader. It determines whether an account is within reach and often signals the broker's target demographic—lower minimums tend to attract retail beginners, while higher thresholds suggest a more professional focus. For Aibos AG, this critical number simply does not exist in the public domain. Our searches returned no official figure and no trustworthy third‑party data.

Without a published minimum, a trader who engages with this broker is entirely at the mercy of whatever figure is quoted during the sign‑up process. There is no way to verify whether the amount is standard across clients or inflated for a particular individual. More worryingly, the lack of a regulator means the broker faces no obligation to segregate client deposits or to maintain any minimum capital reserves, so even a modest deposit carries an unquantifiable risk of loss.

Leverage amplifies both gains and losses, which is why most jurisdictions impose strict caps. In the EU, for instance, major forex pairs are capped at 1:30 for retail clients. For an unregulated entity like Aibos AG, no such cap is enforced—and no leverage information is disclosed. Traders cannot tell whether they are being offered a dangerous 1:1000 gearing or something more conservative, nor can they assess the margin close‑out rules that would protect them from a catastrophic loss.

Trading costs are equally opaque. Are spreads fixed or variable? What is the typical euro/dollar spread during normal market hours?

Is there a commission per lot on top of the raw spread, and if so, is it a flat fee or tiered by volume? We could not answer any of these questions because the broker provides zero pricing data. Hidden costs such as overnight swap fees or inactivity penalties are also completely in the dark.

Without a published fee schedule, a client cannot even begin to calculate the true cost of trading with Aibos AG.

A broker's trading platform is its shop window. Whether it relies on the ubiquitous MetaTrader 4/5, the more modern cTrader, or a proprietary web‑based interface, the platform choice directly affects execution speed, charting quality, and the availability of automated trading. For Aibos AG, the official domain does not resolve to a functioning site, and we found no legitimate download links, WebTerminal login pages, or mobile‑app store listings.

Even the most basic question—does the broker support MetaTrader?—remains unanswered. Without a demonstrable platform, there is no way to verify that the broker actually provides access to live market prices or that its trade execution is anything other than a simulation. A broker that cannot show its technology stack in action is operating in a vacuum of trust, and that is a non‑starter for any serious trader.

A demo account is standard practice in the industry, allowing traders to evaluate execution quality, spread behaviour, and platform stability without risking real money. We specifically looked for any indication that Aibos AG offers a demo environment—a test‑drive equivalent that would at least demonstrate a functioning infrastructure. We found nothing. Not a single mention, link, or sign‑up button for a virtual trading account.

The account‑opening process itself is similarly shrouded. Typically, a regulated broker will guide you through a clear registration form, followed by identity and address verification (KYC) to comply with anti‑money‑laundering laws. For Aibos AG, there is no client portal, no application form, and no KYC policy statement. This lack of process not only raises suspicion about the broker's legitimacy—it may also indicate a deliberate attempt to bypass the checks that protect both the trader and the financial system.

In many scam cases, the absence of a proper account‑opening procedure is a telltale sign: the goal is simply to collect an initial deposit without any intention of returning it.

FXCanary's Scam Risk Score for Aibos AG stands at 55 out of 100, classified as Elevated. This score is not arbitrary; it is the direct consequence of two critical risk flags. First, there is no verified regulatory licence on file—we checked multiple public registries and found zero evidence of authorisation in any jurisdiction. Second, there is no verifiable website or social‑media presence, which means the entity is practically invisible in the digital spaces where legitimate brokers actively engage with clients.

Without a regulator, none of the standard protections apply. There is no deposit insurance, no compulsory participation in a compensation scheme, and no ombudsman to turn to in the event of a dispute. If Aibos AG refuses a withdrawal or manipulates prices, the trader has no external recourse. The risk score reflects our assessment that the probability of a negative outcome—ranging from poor trading conditions to outright fraud—is significantly above average.

We have seen similar profiles in numerous scam operations: a blank website, no licence, and a name that sounds vaguely Swiss or Alpine to instill a false sense of security. The account, in such cases, is merely a vehicle for collecting funds rather than a genuine trading facility.

In light of these findings, we believe every trader should adopt a simple but rigid checklist before even considering opening an account. First, demand a clear, side‑by‑side comparison of account types with documented minimum deposits, leverage ratios, and fee breakdowns. A legitimate broker publishes these proudly because they are a competitive advantage, not a secret.

Second, insist on a working demo account. It takes minutes to set up and instantly reveals whether the broker’s platform operates on live or simulated price feeds. If a broker cannot provide a demo, walk away. Third, verify the regulatory licence number yourself on the regulator’s official website—do not rely on a badge or a certificate displayed on the broker’s site, as these can be easily faked.

Fourth, look for a history of transparent client communication. Is there a publicly listed phone number, a physical office address that can be confirmed through independent sources, and an active customer‑support channel? If all you find is a web form and an email address, treat it as a red flag.

After exhausting every investigative avenue available to us, we are left with one inescapable conclusion: the account offering of Aibos AG is a complete unknown, and that uncertainty is itself the most prominent feature. No account tiers, no minimum deposit, no leverage data, no trading costs, no platform, no demo, no KYC process—every single element that a trader needs to make an informed decision is absent.

An evaluation of a broker should never be built on assumptions, but when the information blackout is this total, the safest assumption is that the operation is not equipped to honestly serve retail clients. The elevated Scam Risk Score reflects this reality, and we urge anyone who encounters a pitch from Aibos AG to exercise extreme caution.

FXCanary will continue to monitor any developments at the domain aibos.ch and will update this article if verifiable account information emerges. Until then, our guidance is unequivocal: there are hundreds of properly regulated, transparent brokers competing for your business—choose one of them and leave the Aibos AG enigma unexplored.